Hypothesis-driven. Telemetry-agnostic. We find the dwell-time the SIEM missed.
Threat hunting is the discipline of looking for adversaries who are already inside but have not yet tripped a rule. We work from intelligence-led hypotheses — specific TTPs, specific actors, specific abuse patterns — across your existing telemetry stack.
Every Versus hunt produces three durable outputs: an explicit verdict on whether the hypothesis was substantiated, a set of new high-fidelity detections delivered in your SIEM and EDR content language, and a hunt playbook your team can run on a quarterly cadence without us.
We hunt in environments others struggle with: identity providers, SaaS estates, OT networks, multi-cloud control planes, and Kubernetes clusters where lateral movement looks like normal traffic.
Each engagement is led by senior operators. Scope is shaped to your environment, not pulled from a template.
Time-boxed assumed-breach hunt across endpoint, identity, network, and cloud telemetry — verdict in two to four weeks.
Token theft, conditional-access bypass, OAuth abuse, and federated-trust abuse hunts in Entra ID, Okta, and AD.
Control-plane abuse, IAM persistence, and exfiltration patterns in AWS, Azure, GCP, M365, and Workspace.
Hunts adapted for operational technology environments where active scanning is unsafe and visibility is partial.
New SIGMA, YARA, and SIEM/SOAR content delivered in your stack’s native language — Sentinel, Splunk, Elastic, Chronicle, CrowdStrike.
Detection content tested against live emulation of the threats it was written for. We don’t ship signatures we haven’t fired.
A consistent rhythm whether the engagement is a single audit or a multi-quarter program.
Intel-led hypotheses tied to threat actors and TTPs relevant to your sector and threat model.
Telemetry inventory, gap analysis, and acquisition strategy across endpoint, identity, network, and cloud.
Iterative search across all available telemetry. Suspicious patterns escalated to live forensics if substantiated.
New detections, identity tightening, and a quarterly hunt playbook delivered for your blue team to operate.
If yours isn’t here, the hotline and engagement intake both reach a senior partner.
MDR is reactive — it processes what fires. Hunting is proactive — it looks for what should be there but is not, or what is there but should not be. They are complementary, not competing.
Yes. We hunt against EDR, identity logs, cloud audit trails, and SaaS APIs directly when needed. A central SIEM helps but is not required.
A documented negative result with full hypothesis, scope, and methodology — plus the new detections we built during the hunt. "Clean" is a finding too, and it has a half-life.
Quarterly is the floor for sophisticated environments. Monthly thematic hunts (identity one month, cloud the next) are common for high-target organizations.
Hunt engagements frequently sit alongside these capabilities. The same operating doctrine, the same partners.
Most engagements begin with a 30-minute scoping call. We’ll tell you within that call whether we’re the right fit.